Court ruling shuts door on Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline

Vancouver – Northern Gateway opponents are celebrating a landmark court decision that strikes down the federal government’s approval of Enbridge’s controversial pipeline project.

“The court has confirmed that the federal government’s consultations with First Nations fell well short of the mark. Our clients are thrilled that the court has quashed the permits and sent this project back to the federal cabinet for reconsideration,” Barry Robinson, Ecojustice lawyer, said. “The court’s decision confirms that the environmental assessment of major pipeline projects was badly eroded by the previous government’s dismantling of environmental laws. I am pleased that the court has given the federal cabinet the option to reassess this project in line with current policies and public interests.”

In its decision, the court determined that the government’s consultation with First Nations failed to provide an opportunity for dialogue about the Joint Review Panel report and failed to fill gaps required to assess the impacts on First Nations.

The court also found that the federal cabinet alone had the power to assess whether the environmental assessment was adequate, a change made by the Harper government.

“First Nations, local communities, and environmental interests said ‘no’ to Enbridge 12 years ago when it first proposed the project. And now that ‘no’ has the backing of the courts,” Robinson said. “Between on-the-ground opposition and the federal government’s promises to keep B.C.’s north coast tanker free and demonstrate climate leadership, this pipeline is never getting built.”

Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline has faced fierce opposition from a diverse array of critics, including Coastal First Nations, municipalities, community groups, and non-profits such as Ecojustice clients Living Oceans Society, Raincoast Conservation Foundation, and Stand (formerly ForestEthics).

In recent weeks, more than 2,000 people have written to the National Energy Board to comment on Enbridge’s request to extend its Dec, 31, 2016 construction deadline.

Throughout the project’s review process, opponents raised concerns about First Nations treaty rights, impacts to at-risk species and fragile ecosystems, and the risk of a catastrophic oil tanker spill off of B.C.’s north coast.

Last October, this opposition led to a historic Federal Court of Appeal hearing, which consolidated 18 separate legal challenges against Enbridge’s pipeline. The hearing, which lasted six days, was the longest of its kind in modern history.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s